The issue
Freight is one of the least visible forces shaping Australian cities.
Ports, airports, distribution centres, construction supply chains and last-mile delivery compete for road, land and kerb space with residents and public transport.
How this affects Australians and Queenslanders
For Australians, productive freight networks support national supply resilience, construction, exports and household affordability.
For Queenslanders, capital and regional cities need freight scenarios linked to land use, automation, energy and changing consumption.
The second-order risk is that urban growth gradually reduces the efficiency of the systems supplying it, raising costs while increasing conflict with nearby communities.
A preferred future would protect strategic corridors and locations before their logistics value becomes impossible to recreate.
This shifts the central question from:
How can today’s freight movements be accommodated?
to:
Which urban corridor or site must be protected now because its future logistics value will be difficult to recreate?
Urban Freight IFM
IFM Phase One – Unique Uplift: Create a productive, low-emissions freight future that supports prosperity and community amenity.
IFM Phase Two – Universal Interest: Establish shared values for reliability, affordability, safety and fairness.
IFM Phase Three – Uniting Possibilities: Unite ports, airports, carriers, residents, planners, energy providers and the future workforce.
IFM Phase Four – Unaligned Factors: Realign urban growth and corridor protection with long-term logistics needs.
IFM Phase Five – Unicity Synthesis: Integrate freight, land use, energy, automation and community outcomes into one system.
#UrbanFreight
#ProductiveCities
#InfrastructureFutures
#InclusiveFutures
#SupplyChains
Originally published on LinkedIn: Dr Colin Russo on LinkedIn